The answer lies in the psychology of persuasion. Another question is how is a group made to hate another group? The political benefits of anti-Semitism can be explained psychologically. It is like people fear the madman because they don’t want to test him. It is possible for someone to go so far out in hate speech without being backed by violence potential? They don’t know the depths or the lengths or the violence potential that underlies this hate. The anti-Semite and indeed the ATB is a terrifying person, everyday people want to assuage his anger and make peace. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. I mentioned awhile back some remarks by anti‐Semites, all of them absurd: “I hate Jews because they make servants insubordinate, because a Jewish furrier robbed me, etc.” Never believe that anti‐ Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. He tries simply to project his intuitive certainty onto the plane of discourse.
If out of courtesy he consents for a moment to defend his point of view, he lends himself but does not give himself. Strong words on foreign policy, economics, abortion, social justice, religion, are opinions. Here is where Sartre’s genius comes in - he says it is not a prejudice it is not even an opinion such as those that are protected by freedom of speech. If it is not a prejudice then what is it? The pretexts of hate are themselves tenuous and might just be a wilful misinterpretation of events. There is no fact or correction you can make to the various ‘anti-pretexts’ to help. An act of prejudice might be you assume someone is incompetent, then he performs well, then that prejudice disappears. Others have pointed out that anti-Semitism is more than just a prejudice, because unlike a genuine prejudice anti-Semitism does not seem to disappear when knowledge comes on the scene.Ī ‘pre-judice’ is a ‘pre-judgment’ that is like a default position based on incomplete knowledge. Once again, I encourage people to read the essay. The only way to do justice to the essay is to post the whole thing.
#DEFINE PATHOLOGICAL FEAR PDF#
That is what I will be focusing on.Ī PDF of this essay is available, Google for “Anti-Semite and Jew” The first part, the psychology of the ant-Semite is a spectacular piece of work that still commands influence decades later. This essay is divided into four parts roughly:ġ) A psycho pathological analysis of the anti-SemiteĤ) a discussion about the religious locality and Zionism. I want to share this with my readers here. I have read this multiple times and it stuns me how well it fits as a general psychological analysis framework even outside the specific European war context.
This question prompted him to write a profoundly deep essay “ Réflexions sur la question juive” later translated to English as “ Anti Semite and Jew – An Etiology of Hate”. Was it a fear of angering the anti-Semite?
In the wake of this jubilation, he was dismayed that hardly anyone in the media was talking about the Jews, who had somehow managed to scrape through the nightmare. In 1944, shortly after the liberation of Paris from German occupation, some of the French Jews started to pour back into Paris and surroundings.
#DEFINE PATHOLOGICAL FEAR FREE#
A fierce thinker of the kind the world hasn’t seen, he even refused to accept the Nobel Prize for fear of unconsciously losing his free thinking. Jean-Paul Sartre is one of the leading lights of the philosophical world known for his contributions to existentialism. Jean-Paul Sartre - The Anti-Semite And Jew This post is about introducing a particularly deep piece of work that already exists in the domain. What is the in the depths of the mind? In the next post, I will describe how these dimensions manifest in the Dravidian ATB individual. While my primary concern is the anti-Brahmin or more precisely the anti-Tamil-Brahmin (ATB) in the state of Tamil Nadu in India, this post is about sharing a well known analytical framework. Only by confronting the etiology of hate and the psychological makeup of the hater can you start building a proper response. When you come face to face with public expressions of malevolence which defy conventional explanations such as difference of opinion or prejudice, you know it is time to go a bit deeper.Ī search into the psychology of the hater will yield the answers.
0 kommentar(er)
